To
my knowledge, there is no way to legally encourage the death of anyone else,
including patients with Alzheimer’s who are at the end stage.
Assisting
someone of sound mind who is dying with their choices for acts which augment
their end of life experience is something some states allow by a written health
directive.
Euthanasia
is murder, legally speaking. The theories behind the prohibition of euthanasia
are:
·
Moral. How can we tell if ending a life is
just result? How can we tell if the patient wants to be euthanized if they can
not communicate? Or even if they did once wish to be euthanized if they ever
couldn’t communicate, how do we know whether that wish is still their
desire/what if they changed their mind?
·
Social. How do create a society in which
euthanasia is not used to create a society which prefers younger or more able
bodied people over all others?
·
Religious. Some people believe a life should
last until its natural end and others believe even with all the medical science
extant to keep people alive, that life should be prolonged until death,
regardless of cost or any consequences.
In
practice, I have seen circumstances in hospitals where doctors and family
members united in their efforts to expedite a loved one’s certain and imminent
death in order to alleviate excruciating suffering. This was euthanasia in
fact, accomplished by increasing the dosage of morphine via intravenous drip until
respiration was slowed, and then stopped.
Reference: Nan Waldman
No comments:
Post a Comment